Friday, April 3, 2009

Developing: Dozen Killed in Binghamton Shooting

Developing Story...
(Updated 3:30 p.m. et Friday)

BINGHAMTON, N.Y. (TheMatadorOnline.com) - Details are still coming into TheMatadorOnline.com newsroom regarding today's shooting in a Binghamton building.

Reports indicate a a gunmen killed at least 12 - possibly 13 - today during a hostage situation at the American Civic Association.

Local media reports the gunman used his vehicle to block a back door to the building before entering the building around 10:30 a.m. et. Once inside, it appears the gunman began to fire at victims randomly.

The American Civic Association provides services to immigrants. Vice President Joe Biden told an audience at the National Action Network that a vast number of immigrants were inside the building taking a citizenship test when the shooter entered.

A total of 41 people are believed to have been taken hostage.

The gunmen killed himself a short time later. He is reported to be a 42-year-old man from upstate New York/

The Binghamton mayor is expected to speak around 4:30 p.m. et.

TheMatadorOnline.com will have more ont his developing story as details become avaiabile.

Map locates Binghamton, N.Y.; more than 10 people killed by gunman at immigration services center. MCT 2009

Binghampton shooter kills self

Bulletin : 14 dead, shooter killed self
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "QuickNews Breaking News Now" group.
To post to this group, send email to quicknewsalerts@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quicknewsalerts+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quicknewsalerts?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Hostage Situtation

Bulletin: Dozens held hostage in Binghampton, NY; shooter still inside

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "QuickNews Breaking News Now" group.
To post to this group, send email to quicknewsalerts@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quicknewsalerts+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quicknewsalerts?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Hybrid showdown: 2010 Toyota Prius vs. 2010 Honda Insight

By Steven Cole Smith

The Orlando Sentinel

(MCT)

Hmm, Prius, Insight. Prius, Insight ...

Among the handful of people who might actually enjoy seeing gasoline return to $4 a gallon, let's include marketing managers for the 2010 Honda Insight and 2010 Toyota Prius, a pair of all-new hybrids set to do battle this spring.

They'll be successful with gas at $2 a gallon, but they'd likely be smash hits if gasoline prices go back up.

Though both names are familiar, these are two new cars. The Honda Insight introduced gasoline-electric hybrids to the U.S. market in 1999, but that car was a little hot dog-shaped two-seater that never sold in big volume.

Toyota was a little later to the hybrid party with the Prius, but it was a four-door with a usable rear seat, and it became a far bigger hit than the Insight. It still sells well _ the Prius accounts for more than half the hybrid cars sold in America.

For 2010, the Insight is back, but it's an entirely different car _ in fact, the resemblance to the Prius is undeniable. It's a four-door hatchback with room for five, powered by a 1.3-liter four-cylinder gasoline engine, aided by an electric motor.

The 2010 Prius is slightly larger than the 2009 model it replaces, and is classified as a midsize car, while the Insight is a compact. Really, the difference in interior space is not that noticeable. The Prius' 1.5-liter four-cylinder gas engine is now 1.8 liters, and while the basic hybrid battery pack is essentially the same as in 2009, the rest of the drive system is, Toyota says, 90 percent new.

Here are the dueling hybrids in a nutshell.

2010 HONDA INSIGHT

While Honda still makes the Civic Hybrid, the new Insight is the first hybrid-only Honda since that original two-seat Insight. It's a handsome car, with room for two adults in the rear, three in a squeeze.

The base-model Insight lists for just less than $20,000, but don't expect to see many at that price on dealer lots. The test Insight had the navigation system with voice activation, and listed for $23,770. Fuel mileage is EPA-rated at 40 mpg in the city, 43 mpg on the highway. I averaged just more than 43 mpg.

2010 TOYOTA PRIUS

Knowing in advance that the Insight was coming, Toyota stepped up the makeover for the 2010 Prius, and it's impressive: There will be a base model likely priced above the current starting price of around $22,000, but add options, and it seems certain the Prius can top $30,000.

Options include a sunroof with a solar panel that doesn't generate electricity for running the car, but for running fans inside the car that can keep the interior cooler while the Prius is parked in the sun. There's also a feature that can actually parallel-park the Prius on its own, with the driver's hands literally off the steering wheel.

Add those two features to leather upholstery and a navigation system, and the Prius becomes almost a luxury hybrid.

Toyota won't release prices of the new Prius for a month or so, closer to its arrival at dealers. But it has released mileage figures: It's EPA-rated at 51 mpg in the city, 48 mpg on the highway.

Why is the city mileage better than the highway mileage? Because the Prius can run on electric-only power at speeds up to 25 miles per hour, and depending on the charge level for the battery, for a distance of almost a mile, using no gasoline at all. I averaged 51.8 mpg in the Prius.

WHICH IS BETTER?

So the biggest question from customers cross-shopping the Insight and the Prius is likely to be this: If the Insight has a smaller gasoline engine, why does it get worse mileage than the Prius?

The answer is because the Prius is a "full" hybrid, meaning it can move along on electric power alone. The Insight is considered a "mild" hybrid, meaning the gasoline engine is always turning. With both cars, the gas engine stops at a red light. With the Insight, it restarts when you take your foot off the brake. With the Prius, it can accelerate _ slowly _ on electric power alone before the gas engine starts up.

Actually, though, it isn't quite that simple, due to Honda's new "integrated assist" feature: While all the internal components of the gas engine are always rotating as the car drives down the road, under certain, limited conditions _ rolling downhill, for instance _ the onboard computer can actually cut the gasoline supply to the engine, while the electric motor does the work.

In essence, the car is operating on battery power alone, but since the engine is always turning, you don't get the stealthy, silent-running experience you do in a Prius.

That said, for pure driving experience, I slightly prefer the Honda. The new Prius steers and handles much better than the current model, but the Honda has a sportier feel, and I'd submit that it's the better-looking car.

If I lived in a big city, though, and was constantly caught in heavy stop-and-go traffic, the Prius would be the better buy in the long run.

Both cars are aimed carefully at their target markets, and both score direct hits. One of these is likely to be the 2010 car of the year.

___

2010 HONDA INSIGHT

Base price: $20,470

Engine size: 1.3-liter four-cylinder with 88 horsepower

EPA overall fuel mileage rating: 41 mpg

EPA classification: Compact car


2010 TOYOTA PRIUS

Base price: $22,750 (estimate)

Engine size: 1.8-liter four-cylinder with 98 horsepower

EPA overall fuel mileage rating: 50 mpg

EPA classification: Midsize car

___

Steven Cole Smith is automotive editor of the Orlando Sentinel. He can be reached at scsmith@orlandosentinel.com.

___

© 2009, The Orlando Sentinel (Fla.).

Visit the Sentinel on the World Wide Web at http://www.orlandosentinel.com/.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Sheriff deputy sentenced after offering surveillance for fake drug delivery

By Vanessa Blum

Sun Sentinel

(MCT)

A former Broward, Fla., sheriff's deputy was sentenced to eight years in prison Thursday for agreeing to guard a shipment of 50 kilograms of cocaine.

Kevin Frankel, 39, was busted last year in an FBI corruption sting after receiving $3,000 to provide surveillance for what he thought was a drug delivery at the Pompano Beach Air Park in Pompano Beach, Fla.

In reality, the "smugglers" were undercover FBI agents posing as mobsters and a drug distributor.

Along with Frankel, U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra in West Palm Beach sentenced Robert Baccari to seven years and Christopher Provenzano to six years for their roles in the attempted drug smuggling operation.

All three pleaded guilty to possessing with the intent to distribute 50 kilograms or more of cocaine.

Richard Tauber, a veteran Broward sheriff's deputy and the group's apparent ringleader, is set to be sentenced May 15.

Tauber, a former Marine who went by "Wingnut", and Frankel, a law enforcement recruit with the nickname "Tattoo," worked for the Broward Sheriff's Office in Deerfield Beach.

Authorities arrested the men last year following a 16-month investigation. According to court records, Tauber was paid $25,000 to help smuggle cocaine, diamonds and Krugerrand gold coins.

Tauber recruited friends Baccari and Provenzano, who together received roughly $23,000. Frankel was brought into the circle to act as a lookout during a supposed cocaine delivery.

After his arrest, Tauber turned on Frankel and wore a wire to record incriminating conversations.

In court papers, Frankel's attorneys asked for leniency, describing the deputy as a minor participant in the crime led astray by his desire to provide financially for his wife and two daughters.

___

© 2009, Sun Sentinel.

Visit the Sun-Sentinel on the World Wide Web at http://www.SunSentinel.com

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Smithtown Woman Killed in Crash, Man Arrested for DWI

Suffolk County Police today arrested a Smithtown man for Driving While Intoxicated after he was involved in a motor vehicle crash that killed a Smithtown woman early this morning.  

 At approximately 3:30 a.m., Karen Naclerio-Negrin was driving her 1992 Volvo southbound on Route 25A in Smithtown and John Harnage was traveling northbound in a 2003 Chevrolet pickup truck. The two vehicles collided near the intersection of Summerset Drive.

 Naclerio-Negrin, 43, of 4 Thide Court, was pronounced dead at the scene by a physician assistant from the Suffolk County Medical Examiner's Office. Harnage, 43 of 83 Oakside Road, was not injured. 

Harnage was arrested by Fourth Precinct officers and charged with Driving While Intoxicated. He will be arraigned today at First District Court in Central Islip. 

Fourth Squad detectives are continuing their investigation and ask anyone with information regarding the incident to call 631-854-8452 or Crime Stoppers at 1-800-220-TIPS.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Obama, allies aren't on same page as G20 opens

By Steven Thomma and Kevin G. Hall

McClatchy Newspapers

(MCT)

LONDON _ With economic peril spreading around the globe, President Barack Obama and other world leaders will convene Wednesday in London, desperate to avoid the mistakes that plunged the planet into the Depression in the 1930s and seeking common approaches to jolt their economies back to life.

Obama landed in London on Tuesday evening, ready to plunge into meetings Wednesday and Thursday. Topping his agenda is affirming national government plans already under way to spend $2.5 trillion to stimulate economies and working out a new global framework to regulate financial markets. This could include extending the regulatory net over hedge funds and offshore tax havens, as well as identifying gaps in regulation between countries.

Another crucial goal: making sure that developed countries avoid protectionism, or shutting themselves off from international trade, a key mistake that helped worsen the worldwide depression more than seven decades ago.

Obama and European allies also seek to empower the International Monetary Fund and World Bank to boost economies great and small and to discourage the erection of trade barriers.

That may be difficult given growing political pressures in many nations. Thousands of protesters are expected to flood London's streets, underscoring how the loss of jobs and pensions in Europe magnifies social stresses and political tensions.

The American president is the fresh face among world leaders, many of whom already were in office when the global financial system went into cardiac arrest last fall. Starting with a dinner Wednesday evening, Obama and colleagues then will work through the day Thursday on what originally had been billed as rewriting the global rules for finance.

The meeting involves the so-called G20, a group of 19 countries with major economies plus the European Union. Together they represent 85 percent of the world's economy, from old European powers to emerging powerhouses such as China and Brazil. Others beyond the 19 are attending as well, including Spain and the Netherlands.

"The stakes for this summit are very high," Michael Froman, the White House's deputy national security adviser for international economic affairs, said in a London briefing Monday. "They are magnified by the fact that much has happened since the last G20 summit in November."

The global financial crisis has deepened since then and countries now are focused on halting the bleeding and restoring growth.

Yet in the weeks leading up to this summit, trans-Atlantic tensions mounted. The Obama administration criticized European allies as not doing enough to stimulate their economies, and they retorted that the United States is moving too slowly to put new rules in place to rein in large financial institutions.

Both have backed off since, but the Obama team suggested that success will be measured in tone, not detail.

"What's important is that there is agreement to do whatever is necessary until growth is restored, there's agreement to take sustained effort until growth is restored and there's agreement to ask the IMF to monitor both what's necessary and what's being done by the G20, and to report back on a regular basis," Froman said. "Every country has adopted stimulus. They're in the process of implementing it."

France and Germany have warned against a summit that seeks a consensus so general that it lacks relevance.

(EDITORS: STORY CAN END HERE)

French newspapers reported this week that President Nicolas Sarkozy would insist on benchmarks for gauging progress on the imposition of new regulations over finance. He threatened in mid-March to walk out of the G20 summit if serious progress isn't being made.

In an interview with London's Financial Times published Friday, German leader Angela Merkel hadn't backed off from her emphasis on regulation instead of spending.

"The crisis did not take place because we were spending too little but because we were spending too much to create growth that was not sustainable. It isn't just that the banks took over too many risks. Governments allowed them to do so by neglecting to set the necessary (financial market) rules and, for instance in the U.S., by increasing the money supply too much," she said.

The United States and England, however, are unlikely to support hasty moves to new regulation.

"Self-interest wins in the end always, and the United States and the U.K. get more out of financial services than anyone else. We have the two world financial capitals. It's not in our interest to have other people write the regulations or have regulations that try to average across many nations," said Vincent Reinhart, a former top economist at the Federal Reserve.

Likewise, he cautioned, big nations such as China and Russia, and the smaller but important European powers, see it in their interest to impose new rules on London and New York.

"I don't see how you reconcile that difference in national interests," said Reinhart, who's a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative research center. "I think it's going to be very hard for the U.S. to make this summit a success."

(EDITORS: STORY CAN END HERE)

Obama did steal some of the European thunder last week, outlining his own vision for a tougher new regulatory environment that included new oversight for hedge funds, which control vast pools of global capital. It included a call for new rules that would force banks to keep more cash on hand and prevent them from investing so heavily with borrowed money. That's amplified the global financial crisis.

Even if not resolved in London, pressure for new global rules will remain.

"We're still trying to fragment regulation in a global financial market, and we're discovering it doesn't work," said David Wyss, the chief economist for rating agency Standard & Poor's in New York. He expects little more than a framework to be accomplished this week. "I think there will be some attempt to smooth the feathers."

___

© 2009, McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Visit the McClatchy Washington Bureau on the World Wide Web at www.mcclatchydc.com.

_____